NuePrism Setup & Evaluation
How a NuePrism pilot evaluation is scoped, set up, and assessed — from initial Jira connection through the evaluation decision point.
1. Purpose
A NuePrism evaluation is intended to determine whether NuePrism can identify meaningful execution risk from a team's Jira data, provide traceable supporting evidence, and surface useful interventions early enough for the responsible delivery roles to act.
2. Suggested Evaluation Scope
We recommend beginning with a deliberately controlled scope:
No expansion to additional teams or data sources is required for the initial evaluation. NueArcus assists with setup and configuration to minimize implementation effort.
3. What NuePrism Supports Today
Team Configuration
NuePrism supports team-level configuration including: team operating model/type, applicable Jira work-item structure, roles and responsibilities, and role-specific responsibility for actions/interventions. The configured operating model influences which execution principles, signals, and thresholds are applicable to that team.
Execution Diagnosis
NuePrism evaluates Jira execution data through deterministic signals and configured thresholds to identify execution conditions requiring attention.
Execution Verdict
The diagnosed signals are synthesized into an execution verdict identifying areas where intervention may be required.
Supporting Evidence
The verdict is connected to the underlying Jira evidence so the reasoning can be inspected rather than simply accepted.
Role-Routed Intervention
Recommended actions are directed to the role responsible for addressing the identified execution condition.
Auditability
The diagnostic chain from execution signal through evidence, verdict, and intervention remains inspectable.
4. Proposed Setup
5. High-Level Data Flow
Detailed permissions, data fields, storage, retention/deletion requirements, and security controls are agreed before production customer data is connected. See NuePrism Security & Data Handling Overview.
6. What We Propose to Evaluate
The evaluation should answer four practical questions:
Did NuePrism identify execution conditions that delivery leaders considered worth knowing about?
Could the team inspect the underlying Jira evidence and understand why the condition was raised?
Did the diagnosis reflect the team's actual operating model and execution context?
Was the recommended intervention useful to the person responsible for the delivery outcome?
7. Security Before Connection
Before production data is connected, the evaluating organization and NueArcus agree the required:
- Jira access scope and permissions
- Data fields processed
- Data storage and handling expectations
- Access controls
- Retention and deletion requirements
- Applicable security-review requirements
A separate NuePrism Security & Data Handling Overview accompanies this document and describes the current architecture, data handling, AI processing, tenant isolation, access controls, retention/deletion status, backup/recovery, and current compliance posture.
The security position distinguishes between: Implemented controls → Inherited infrastructure/provider controls → Controls in progress / gaps. NueArcus will not represent a certification or control as available unless it can be evidenced.
8. Evaluation Outcome
At the end of the agreed evaluation period, the evaluating organization and NueArcus jointly review the evidence and determine the appropriate next step:
The evaluation therefore has a defined decision point rather than becoming an open-ended PoC.
Ready to scope a pilot evaluation?
View the product tour or request a walkthrough with your team's own data.
Last updated: September 2026