NuePrism Docs
All docs Contact support View product tour →
Documentation / NuePrism Security & Data Handling Overview

NuePrism Security & Data Handling Overview

A current-state overview of how NuePrism accesses, processes, stores, protects, and uses customer data during a controlled pilot evaluation.

NuePrism is progressing through enterprise evaluation readiness. This document deliberately distinguishes between implemented NuePrism controls, inherited infrastructure/provider controls, provider-policy-based controls, and controls or certifications still in progress. Where a control cannot currently be evidenced, NuePrism does not represent it as completed.

1. Purpose

This document gives prospective customers a transparent view of:

2. Data Flow

Current flow:

Customer Jira → Atlassian Forge-based integration → NuePrism API/Processing Layer → NuePrism Database → Diagnostic Processing → AI Reasoning Layer → Evidence-Backed Verdict and Intervention → NuePrism User Experience

The current application uses Jira as its production execution-data source. NuePrism processes Jira execution information to diagnose delivery conditions, identify supporting evidence, generate an execution verdict, and provide role-routed interventions.

The AI reasoning layer is used as part of this processing architecture. The underlying execution diagnosis is based on NuePrism's configured execution principles, deterministic signals, thresholds, team context, and supporting evidence.

3. Data Storage

Customer execution data is stored in NuePrism's application database for analysis and generation of execution verdicts, evidence, and recommendations.

4. Data Protection

Data in transit is encrypted using HTTPS/TLS.

Data stored in Supabase is protected by Supabase-managed storage encryption, covering the underlying database storage/disk. Authorized admins and the backend application can read the data through the normal authorized database view — storage encryption is a disk-level control and is not a substitute for access control.

NuePrism does not store customer passwords — authentication is handled through Atlassian/Jira identity controls (see Section 6).

Network protection

Tenant isolation

Tenant isolation is implemented in the current NuePrism application architecture.

ControlStatus
Separate field-level encryptionNot currently used
Customer-managed encryption keys (BYOK)Not currently used
Formal production access-review processBeing formalized
Defined cadence for periodic review of privileged/admin accessBeing formalized

5. AI / Model Handling

NuePrism uses AI reasoning together with structured execution evidence to generate analysis and recommendations.

Production AI provider

The current production AI reasoning flow uses the OpenAI Platform API. Based on the engineering team's current implementation, a smaller model is used for processing and a larger model for synthesis. Exact deployed model names are confirmed against the deployed environment configuration and provider usage records upon request.

Customer data sent to the AI layer includes

Not sent to the AI provider in the current production flow

The data sent to the AI provider is not currently de-identified before processing. Therefore, assignee and change-author display names may be included in the AI-processing context.

Model training

According to OpenAI's published API policy, API data is not used for model training by default. The exact terms applicable to a given account remain subject to the production OpenAI account/project configuration and applicable provider agreement.

Provider data retention

Under OpenAI's standard API policy, API data may be retained for up to 30 days for abuse monitoring, unless different retention arrangements such as Zero Data Retention apply. Exact retention configuration is confirmed against the provider account and contractual terms.

Inference region

OpenAI processing is currently treated as US-based by default. Non-US data-residency options may be available through provider-level account/project or contractual configuration and would be reviewed separately if required.

Optional Gemini integration

NuePrism also contains an optional Google Gemini Developer API integration. This integration is currently disabled from the production NuePrism flow and is used only for internal evaluation. It would not be enabled for customer data without a separate review.

6. Access Control

NuePrism's current Jira experience uses Atlassian identity for end-user authentication. NuePrism does not maintain a separate customer password store for these users. MFA requirements therefore follow the authentication policies configured within the customer's Atlassian environment.

For the backend infrastructure itself:

The formal internal process for granting, reviewing, and revoking privileged production/database access is currently being formalized. The Atlassian Forge deployment and validation process is also currently in progress; this is separate from NuePrism's internal production-access governance.

7. Customer-Data Deletion

NuePrism currently supports partial cleanup when the Forge application is removed, including Jira issue snapshots, changelogs, Forge configuration, and Forge secrets.

A complete tenant-wide deletion mechanism covering all analysis records, user/admin records, logs, backups, and AI traces is still being completed. For a pilot evaluation, the exact deletion process and retention commitment is agreed with the customer before data is onboarded. NuePrism does not currently represent complete automated tenant deletion as fully available.

8. Backup and Recovery

NuePrism uses Supabase Pro's managed daily backup service.

If a restore is performed from a given backup point, the database returns to the state that existed at that backup time; transactions occurring after that point are not included in the restored data. A restore test was performed against an available daily backup point and confirmed successful. The same restore process applies to any available backup point within the seven-day retention window.

9. Compliance Status

NuePrism does not currently represent itself as SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certified. Enterprise security and compliance readiness is being formalized as the product progresses through enterprise evaluations.

Current areas being assessed or formalized include: SOC 2, ISO 27001, penetration testing, vulnerability scanning, incident-response process, data-retention policy, privacy/DPA/subprocessor documentation, backup/recovery procedures, and a formal privileged-access review process.

Where a control is provided by the underlying cloud, infrastructure, platform, or AI provider, it is identified separately as an inherited control rather than represented as a NuePrism certification. NuePrism's approach is to classify controls transparently as:

Implemented Inherited & verified In progress Not currently available

10. Pilot Approach

For a proposed pilot evaluation, NuePrism recommends:

Before connection, the evaluating organization and NueArcus agree on: Jira access scope, Jira fields to be processed, data transmitted to the NuePrism environment and to the AI provider, applicable data-storage locations, provider retention terms, evaluation-period retention requirements, data-deletion expectations, and any additional security requirements from the evaluating organization.

The objective is to validate the product with the minimum necessary data exposure.

The core evaluation question: Can NuePrism identify meaningful execution risk, explain the evidence behind it, and provide useful interventions early enough for delivery leaders to act?

Want to discuss a pilot evaluation for your organization?
View the product tour or request a walkthrough with your team's own data.

Last updated: September 2026